Regular readers of WAMK from back in the Townhall days remember Guy Arthur Thomas as a proud supporter of all things Tiger Woods. He went bat-shit crazy when I questioned if there were any PED users on the PGA Tour, and pointed to Tiger as potentially being on the juice (or more likely, HGH). My point was that like Barry Bonds, Tiger has the same things he wants to achieve:
- Be the best of all-time at his sport
- Makes tons of money
- Gain the admiration/adulation of fans
- Re-write the record books
These items clearly describe both men. Both men also exhibited extreme changes to their bodies in a short period of time. One cheated, the other we don't know. GAT defended Tiger without question. I have no way of knowing if Tiger is/was using any kind of PED's to gain an advantage, but my point was/is a valid one. We've seen drug scandals in every major sport, many of the Olympic ones, and do I even have to mention the Tour de France? GAT wants us to believe that the PGA tour is exempt, because it's a gentleman's game. With multi-million dollar payouts and sponsorships.
Anyway, I've been wondering what GAT's take on the Tiger Tale is. I'm sure he's writing it off as nothing to see, just circumstantial evidence. Law Professor Jacobsen has three questions for Mrs. Woods:
I want to believe Tiger Wood's statement that the rumors about his wife attacking him are false. Refusing to speak with the police, however, is not a good sign.
One issue keeps popping back into my mind on this. Tiger's wife reportedly helped extricate him from the car by smashing a window with a golf club.
So where did she get the golf club?
Even in the Tiger Wood's household, it is hard to believe that Mrs. Wood's first thought, upon realizing that her husband's car had crashed, was "let me grab a golf club." And at 2:25 in the morning, it is doubtful that she was practicing her chip shot at the time.
Second question.
Why didn't she just open the door? The photos show only damage to the front end. The Escalade SUV is a big vehicle, and it is hard to believe that none of the doors would open merely because of a relatively modest front-end collision.
Third question.
Why am I blogging about this? Another waste of a good education (see, I said it, so no need to send e-mails telling me what I already know).
Recent Comments